HARENDRA NATH CHAUBEY v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/39547/2024 · 2025-09-18
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106768 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106768 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39547 of 2024 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
1. Sri Raj Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Deepak Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of the impugned order dated 10.04.2024 passed by Special Judge Prevention of Corruption Act, District Varanasi, Court No. 1 in Case Crime No. 41-B of 2006, under Sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, 218 r/w Section 120-B/34 I.P.C., Police Station Sukhpura, District Ballia.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that byway of instant application, applicant challenged the order dated 10.04.2024 by which process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. was issued against him but now instant application has become infructuous and therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
4. Learned A.G.A. is having no objection.
5. In view of the above, instant application filed by the applicant stands dismissed as infructuous. September 19, 2025 SK Srivastava Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raj Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sameer Jain,J.) Harendra Nath Chaubey .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SAILESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad