Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10668 (RAJ)

RAMZAN KHAN v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/2247/2002 · 2025-02-12

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2247/2002 Ramzan Khan, aged about 40 years, son of Shri Ilahi Buksh Khan resident of Ahata Area, Dedraj Khaitan Colony, Losal, Siker. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Local Self Government, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Local Bodies, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Municipal Board, Losal District, Sikar through its Executive Officer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Saxena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sakshi Tiwari JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 12/02/2025 1. By way of filing of this petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 27.03.2002, by which services of the petitioner were terminated. A prayer has been made to reinstate the petitioner back in service with continuity. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court while passing an interim order on 10.04.2002, stayed the operation of the impugned order dated 27.03.2002 and later on, the said interim order was made absolute vide order dated 27.05.2002. Counsel submits that in consequence of the order dated 10.04.2002, the petitioner was reinstated (2 of 2) [CW-2247/2002] back in service and he was allowed to continue in service and his services have been regularized w.e.f. 01.07.1981 and accordingly, all service benefits have been accorded to the petitioner and finally the petitioner has retired on 31.05.2022 after attaining the age of superannuation. Counsel submits that in view of the subsequent circumstances, which has occurred during pendency of this petition, the instant petition be disposed of in the light of the subsequent events. 3. Counsel for the respondent is not in a position to controvert the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. The instant writ petition stands disposed of in view of the subsequent events/ circumstances taken place between the parties and accordingly, the impugned order dated 27.03.2002 stands quashed and set aside. 5. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/21