Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10668 (JHR)

DINESH TURI v. RAJENDRA ROY And ORS.

WPC/6390/2010 · 2025-01-15

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6390 of 2010 Dinesh Turi, S/o Late Brinchi Turi, R/o Village-Samlapur, PO & PS- Borio, District-Sahibganj … … Petitioner Versus 1. Rajendra Roy, S/o Late Chhedi Roy 2. Gyan Wati Devi, D/o Late Chhedi Roy 3. Chandmuni, D/o Late Chhedi Roy All R/o Village-Samlapur, PS-Borio (J), District-Sahibganj … … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Ms. Chandana Kumari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. S.N. Das, Advocate Mr. Om Prakash Singh, Advocate ----- 13/15.01.2025 Reference may be made to order dated 21.02.2022 whereby time till 25.02.2022 was granted to the petitioner to file a substitution petition to substitute the respondent no. 3, failing which the writ petition was to be dismissed without further reference to the Bench. 2. No substitution petition has yet been filed on behalf of the petitioner to substitute the respondent no. 3. 3. It has been reported by the office that the present writ petition was not dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 21.02.2022 due to the direction/observation of learned Full Bench of this Court as contained in the order dated 15.02.2022 passed in Cr.M.P No. 1814 of 2020 during the Covid-19 period, whereby orders of interim nature passed in different cases were extended till 22.03.2022 or till the concerned case was taken up for hearing by the concerned Court or Bench. 4. The present writ petition was subsequently taken up for consideration by a Bench of this Court on 09.04.2024 and on the said date, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 2 W.P.(C). No. 6390 of 2010 However, it could not be pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondents regarding non-compliance of order dated 21.02.2022 by the petitioner. 5. Since no substitution petition has yet been filed on behalf of the petitioner to substitute the respondent no. 3 and that the writ petition has already been taken up for consideration by a Bench of this Court as well as this Court, the order dated 21.02.2022 passed in this case has come into force. Hence, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 21.02.2022. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manish