RATTI DEVI WIFE OF SHRI ASHOK KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/3907/2025 · 2025-05-01
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10666 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10666 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18396] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3907/2025 Ratti Devi Wife Of Shri Ashok Kumar, Aged About 56 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 24, Tijara Road Se Bhagwanpura Road, Saai Mandir Ke Paas, Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.
3. District Education Officer (Head Quarter), Secondary Education, Alwar.
4. Principal, Mahatma Gandhi Government School, Todiyar, Umren, District Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Chand Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 01/05/2025
1. By means of filing instant writ petition under Article 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been made by the petitioner to the order dated 23.01.2025 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur (for short “the Tribunal”), dismissing her Appeal No.113/2025 and affirming the transfer
order dated 06.12.2024, transferring the petitioner, as Teacher Gr. III Level I, from Mahatama Gandhi Government School, Todiyar, Umren, District Alwar to Government Senior Secondary School, Akbarpur, Umren, District Alwar.
[2025:RJ-JP:18396] (2 of 2) [CW-3907/2025]
2. Having heard counsel for petitioner and from perusal of record, this Court finds that the Tribunal has considered the case of petitioner on merits and has dismissed the appeal of petitioner vide order dated 23.01.2025 and same does not suffer from any malafide or illegality. In such view of matter, counsel for petitioner, on instructions of petitioner, does not want to pursue the writ petition on merits and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/4