Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10665 (AP)

YERUSU SRINIVASA RAO v. KANTHILAL DANDE, IAS

CC/760/2025 · 2025-08-21

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010121852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 760/2025 Between: 1. YERUSU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. APPA RAO, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO. 7 VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 1. KANTHILAL DANDE IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS BUILDINGS (R8SB) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI K NAYEEMULLA, THE CHIEF ENGINEER (R AND B) ADMINISTRATION AND NDB, NEW R AND B BUILDING, 5TH FLOOR, M.G.ROAD, OPP INDIRA GANDHI MUNICIPAL STADIUM, VIJAYAWADA. 4. SRI JOHN SUDHAKAR, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R AND B CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKA 5. SRI PUTCHALA SATYANARAYANA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DIVISION, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 760/2025 YERUSU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. APPA RAO, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO. 7-70, RAJA VEEDHI, MELIAPUTTI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND KANTHILAL DANDE IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS BUILDINGS (R8SB) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. K NAYEEMULLA, THE CHIEF ENGINEER (R AND B) ADMINISTRATION AND NDB, NEW R AND B BUILDING, 5TH FLOOR, M.G.ROAD, OPP INDIRA GANDHI MUNICIPAL STADIUM, SRI JOHN SUDHAKAR, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R AND B CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. SRI PUTCHALA SATYANARAYANA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B DIVISION, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA YERUSU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. APPA RAO, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC 70, RAJA VEEDHI, MELIAPUTTI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER KANTHILAL DANDE IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS (R8SB) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, K NAYEEMULLA, THE CHIEF ENGINEER (R AND B) ADMINISTRATION AND NDB, NEW R AND B BUILDING, 5TH FLOOR, M.G.ROAD, OPP INDIRA GANDHI MUNICIPAL STADIUM, SRI JOHN SUDHAKAR, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, R AND SRI PUTCHALA SATYANARAYANA, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the Respondents under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for willful violation of orders of this Honble Court in W.P. No. 14691 of 2023 dated 06-07-2023 delivered by Honble Smt. Justice V. Sujatha and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMBABU KOPPINEEDI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Y BALAJI The Court made the following: 3 HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE No.760 of 2025 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.14691 of 2023, dated 06.07.2023. The operative portion of the said order is extracted hereunder: “5.In view of the common order passed by this Court and after hearing the submissions of learned counsel on both sides, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to release total amount of Rs.4,34,549/- to the petitioner within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is open to the petitioner to agitate his claim for interest, if any, payable by the respondents, in an appropriate forum.” 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, Mr. Y.Balaji, learned counsel representing the contemnors/respondents has furnished a copy of the letter dated 22.08.2025 of the respondent No.5, which indicates that an amount of Rs.2,48,044/- was paid to the petitioner on 22.08.2025 vide reference No.RBI2342562153685 and an amount of Rs.1,86,505/- was paid on the same day i.e. 22.08.2025 vide reference No.RBI2342562153684, which in fact is in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court, which fact was also admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4 3. As the respondents have released the amounts in favour of the petitioner on 22.08.2025, as directed by this Court, this Court is of the opinion that no contempt lies against the respondents. 4. Recording the same, the Contempt Case is closed, as the respondents have already complied with the orders passed by this Court dated 06.07.2023 in writ petition No.14691 of 2023. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 22.08.2025 MDP