Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10664 (UTT)

VIJAY BHARAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1992/2021 · 2025-04-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1992 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Shusheel Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. G.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State. 3. There is no representation for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous, as charge sheet has been submitted in the matter on 25.02.2022, against petitioner nos. 1 to 3, and petitioner no.4 has been exonerated, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is closed with liberty to the charge- sheeted petitioners to challenge the said charge sheet, in accordance with law, before appropriate forum. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.04.2025 SK