PRASHANT RAO AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/37777/2024 · 2025-03-17
Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106625 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106625 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:38526 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37777 of 2024 Applicant :- Prashant Rao And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Byas Kumar Prasad,Manish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Jitendra Kumar Bind,Viveka Nand Maurya Hon'ble Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.
1. Heard Sri Manish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Mrityunjay Kumar holding brief of Shri Viveka Nand Maurya, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Shri K. K. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 12.11.2022 and cognizance order dated 06.01.2024 as well as entire criminal proceeding in Case No. 1543/2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 0138/2022, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S.- Kankarkhera, District- Meerut, pending in the court of learned C.J.M. Meerut. 3. It is jointly submitted by learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for informant that dispute between the parties is matrimonial in nature and now parties have settled their dispute amicably and written compromise dated 18.09.2024 has also been entered between them, copy of same has been annexed as Annexure 4 to the affidavit. It is further submitted that original deed of compromise has already been filed before the court below. A further request is made by both the parties that on the basis of compromise deed, this application may be dispose of. 4. However, learned A.G.A. has submitted that the aforesaid compromise is yet to be verified by the court below, therefore, a direction may be issued to court below to verify the aforesaid compromise. 5. In view of the above, present application is disposed of with direction to learned court below to verify the aforesaid compromise after summoning the parties and the court below may terminate the impugned proceeding on the basis
of verified compromise in accordance with law. 6. It is further directed that the aforesaid exercise shall be concluded by the court below within a period of two months and for a period of two months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. 7. However, the applicant is granted liberty to file a fresh application under Section 528 BNSS to quash the main proceedings, if need arises.
Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Sharad/- Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad