[2025:RJ-JP:37020] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1684/2002 Madan Gopal Jangu s/o Shri Jaisa Ram Jangu, aged 50 years, resident of Plot No.157, Sector 11-B, Hanumangarh Jn. District Hanumangarh (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, through its Managing Director, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House Scheme, Jaipur. 2. The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House Scheme, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.L. Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 11/09/2025 1. Perusal of the record reveals that when the matter was listed on 10.09.2025, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner and the following order was passed:- “None present on behalf of the parties even in second round. In the interest of justice, last opportunity is granted to learned counsel for the parties to make their submissions. List this matter tomorrow i.e. 11.09.2025.“ 2. Today again, nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the present writ petition. [2025:RJ-JP:37020] (2 of 2) [CW-1684/2002] 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present matter pertains to the compulsory retirement of the petitioner on attaining the age of 50 years and completing 25 years of qualifying service. He further submits that the order dated 20.02.2002 (Annexure-2) was passed by the respondents in exercise of the right conferred under Rule 18D (1) of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Workers & Workshop Employees Standing Orders, 1965. 4. He further submits that in lieu of three months' previous notice, a cheque No.568949 dated 20.02.2002 of Rs.33,281/- was given to the petitioner for the said notice period. 5. From the record of the case, it is reflected that the petitioner, perhaps due to the efflux of time, is not interested in pursuing the present writ petition, therefore, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the writ petition, if the cause of action still survives. 7. Other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /2