Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4803-2024 (O&M) Decided on:-20.05.2025 Jarnail Singh ....Petitioner.. vs. Sh. Tejveer Singh (IAS), Additional Chief Secretary, Local Bodies Deptt., Municipal Bhawan and another ...Respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr.Rajesh Kumar Girdhar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Ms. Gurneet Sagoo, Advocate for respondent No.2.
**** HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that a sum of Rs.11,55,000/- has been credited in the account of the petitioner.
2. In view thereof, no cause survives in the present petition, as such, the same is disposed of. Rule stands discharged. However, in case, petitioner still feels aggrieved with respect to any unsatisfied claim, he would be at liberty to approach the respondents.
3. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 20.05.2025
(HARKESH MANUJA) sonika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/ No SONIKA 2025.05.21 10:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document