Aruldoss v. State of Tamilnadu rep by, sub Inspector of police
CRL OP/26305/2025 · 2025-09-24
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106581 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106581 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 26305 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 26305 of 2025
1. Aruldoss S/o,V.K.Chandran, Ambedkar street, Virudampet Vellore, Tamilnadu -632006. Petitioner(s) Vs
1. State of Tamilnadu rep by, sub Inspector of police Virudampet Police Station, Vellore District. Crime No. 163/2025. Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest by the Respondent police in the case pending investigation in Crime No. 163/2025, on the file of the Respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Kasirajan S P.Anandakumar S.Ramesh https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 26305 of 2025 M.Saravanan S.Saravana Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(A), 4(1)(C) of Tamilnadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act in Crime No.163 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 22 bottles of task mark liquor.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioner was having illegal possession of 22 bottles of task mark liquor. He https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 26305 of 2025 would further submit that there are twenty seven previous cases, similar in nature, pending against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the nature of offence committed by the petitioner, and taking note of the fact that there are twenty seven previous cases, similar in nature, pending against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 24-09-2025 mpa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 26305 of 2025 To 1.Judicial Magistrate Court, Vellore. 2.State of Tamilnadu rep by, sub Inspector of police Virudampet Police Station, Vellore District. Crime No. 163/2025. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 26305 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. mpa CRL OP No. 26305 of 2025
24-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis