Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10658 (UTT)

SURESHA NAND MAMGAIN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1997/2021 · 2025-03-28

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1997 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Susheel Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Ankush Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner on 21.12.2021. 4. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 5. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet before the appropriate Forum under the appropriate law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 28.03.2025 AK