Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10658 (RAJ)

DR. NIDHI GUPTA D/O MUKESH GUPTA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3679/2025 · 2025-03-11

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:11083] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3679/2025 Dr. Nidhi Gupta D/o Mukesh Gupta, Aged About 30 Years, P/o C- 36, C-Block, Kirti Nagar, Ramesh Nagar, West Delhi, Delhi- 110015 R/o Currently Present In Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. The Director/ Additional Director (P.h.), Medical And Health Services, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Swasthaya Bhawan, C-Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Jaipur, 302007 (Raj). 3. Office Of Chairman Dm/m.ch/md/ms Candidates Allotments Board-2024, Ruhs College Of Dental Sciences, Subhash Nagar, Behind Tb Hospital, Jaipur. 4. The Principal S.m.s. Medical College And Hospital, Gangawal Park, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 302004. 5. National Medical Commission, Through Its Secretary, Pocket-14, Sector-8, Phase-I, Dwarka, New Delhi-110077 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Purvi Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 11/03/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the instant matter is squarely covered by the ratio of the judgment passed by this court in S.B. CWP No. 1347/2024 titled Dr. Amit Soni vs. State of Raj. Hence, the instant petition can be settled in light of the dictum enunciated in Dr. Amit Soni (Supra). [2025:RJ-JP:11083] (2 of 2) [CW-3679/2025] The above said fact is not refuted by the learned counsel for the respondents. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court directs the respondents to carry forward the requisites as per the dictum of Dr. Amit Soni (Supra) and release the documents/credentials/certificates/mark-sheets of petitioner on undertaking. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/s-305