Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 106579 (ALL)

VIRENDRA SINGH RANA v. State of UP AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/17756/2024 · 2025-02-18

Neeraj Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23740 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17756 of 2024 Petitioner :- Virendra Singh Rana Respondent :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Chandra Kushwaha,Sanjeev Kumar,Syed Mohammad Abbas Abdy Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "I) issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari calling for records and quashing quash the provision stating restoration period as 15 years in Uttar Pradesh Civil Pension (Commutation) Rules, 1941 as amended by G.O. NO. Sankhya-3-1508/ das-2008-308-97 dated 8.12.2008 issued by Finance (General) Section-3 of State of Uttar Pradesh dated 8.12.2008. II). issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus for restoration period of commuted pension amount from 15 years to 10 years 11 months or at best 11 years instead of 15 years as provided in the G.O. dated 8.12.2008." 3. Learned Standing Counsel submitted that present controversy has already been decided by Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.01.2025 passed in Writ-A No. 17819 of 2024 (Ashok Kumar Agarwal and 48 Others v. Union Of India and another); Neutral Citation No.-2025:AHC:6439-DB, therefore, this petition may also be dismissed on same terms. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid submissions made by learned Standing Counsel. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed in terms of order dated 15.01.2025 passed in Writ-A No. 17819 of 2024. 6. No order as to costs. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad