Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 106574 (ALL)

SMT ROSHANI AND ANOTHER v. State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/36756/2024 · 2025-04-04

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:49125 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36756 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt Roshani And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent nos.2 to 4 not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. Vide earlier order dated 8.11.2024 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the petitioners were directed to approach the respondent no.3 in case of any apprehension of threat to their lives and property and if that be so, respondent no. 3 was directed to take adequate measures after fresh evaluation of the threat assessment. 4. Learned Standing counsel submitted that despite having the order dated 8.11.2024, petitioners have not approached the respondent no.3 till today meaning thereby, they are not having any grievance. 5. In view of the statement so may be learned Standing Counsel which has also not been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner, once petitioners have not approached respondent no.3 being aggrieved with any alleged action taken by respondent no.4 despite having order dated 8.11.2024 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and as such, there is hardly any cause of action survives in favour of petitioners to pursue the instant petition. 6. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 5.4.2025 Mukesh Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad