Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10657 (UTT)

JULFKAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

CRLR/486/2019 · 2025-07-02

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:5590 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CRLR No. 486 of 2019 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Mohd Azim, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned AGA for the State. 3. Ms. Pushpa Joshi, learned Senior counsel, assisted by Ms. Chetna Latwal, learned counsel for the respondent. 4. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist has already been died, and as such, the instant revision is rendered infructuous. 5. In view of the statement as given by learned counsel for the revisionist, the instant criminal revision is dismissed as infructuous. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 02.07.2025 R.Bisht 2025:UHC:5590