Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10656 (UTT)

SATISH KUMAR AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/946/2025 · 2025-08-29

Ashish Naithani

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:7689 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS IA No.01 of 2025 (Compounding Application) In WPCRL No. 946 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. I. D. Paliwal, learned counsel for the Petitioners. 2. Mr. S. S. Chauhan, learned D.A.G. assisted by Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Rohit Kumar, learned counsel for Respondent no.3. 4. The present writ petition (criminal) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed on behalf of the Petitioners, Satish Kumar S/o Sri Ashok Kumar, Vipin Kumar S/o Sri Rajesh Kumar and Amar Jeet Singh @ Sonu Kumar S/o Sri Ramesh Chandra against the Respondent in particular Respondent no.3, Tahir Hussain S/o Shakeel Ahmad, who is the complainant; the present writ petition comes with the prayer to quash the impugned F.I.R. No.146 of 2025 dated 29.05.2025 for the offence punishable under Sections 115/118 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, registered at P.S. I.T.I., Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Compounding Application (IA No.01 of 2025) is also annexed with the signatures of the parties with the present application that is supported with the affidavit of the parties and the said application is being endorsed by the learned counsel for the petitioners and Respondent no.3/complainant, Mr. I. 2025:UHC:7689 D. Paliwal, Advocate and Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate respectively. 6. The Petitioners, Satish Kumar, Vipin Kumar & Amar Jeet Singh and Respondent No.3, Tahir Hussain are present before this Court, who are identified by their respective counsel. 7. After interacting with the parties especially with Respondent no.3, Tahir Hussain the complainant makes a statement that he does not want to proceed with the aforesaid impugned F.I.R. against the petitioners, therefore, the proceedings and other consequential order, if any, arising out of the F.I.R. in question may be quashed whereas learned State counsel poses his formal objection in this regard. 8. In view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The impugned F.I.R. No.146 of 2025 dated 29.05.2025 for the offence punishable under Sections 115/118 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, registered at P.S. I.T.I., Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, is hereby quashed against the petitioners. 9. The present writ petition (criminal) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is, thus, disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 29.08.2025 Akash AKASH Digitally signed by AKASH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=dae2472c001d56469ea76fc0caa68f48ef73518c1 48d140566ab1e26f9cbe61d, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=27096a1625377537a487dee49224c89182 3fc6a0334628b21e516047ed4f22f7, cn=AKASH Date: 2025.08.30 10:22:52 +05'30'