Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10656 (PAT)

Raushan Mandal @ Raushan Kumar Mandal v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./4801/2025 · 2025-02-25

Prabhat Kumar Singh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4801 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2024 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Raushan Mandal @ Raushan Kumar Mandal Son of Prikshan Mandal Resident of village - Milichak (Bajitpur), Ps- Bahadurpur, Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Baidyanath Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 25-02-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per prosecution case, informant alleged that while his driver, namely Santosh Kumar Sadav, was returning with a pick up vehicle in the meantime, three unknwon persons riding on a motorcycle and four others on a Scorpio vehicle attempted to stop him and fired three shots, which hit glass and gate of the pickup van. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. Name of petitioner transpired in this case during course of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4801 of 2025(2) dt.25-02-2025 2/2 investigation. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner has got one criminal antecedent of similar nature. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, material surfaced during course of investigation and fact that petitioner has got one criminal antecedent of similar nature, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T