Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10655 (AP)

B.Kamakshi v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/5397/2019 · 2025-08-13

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010121622019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5397/2019 Between: 1. B.KAMAKSHI, W/O. B.VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO. 17/331-5, BANK COLONY, PAMARRU ROAD, GUDIVADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PAMARRU POLICE STATION, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. PARISA NANCHARAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. PAMARRU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. KOLLA JYOTHI, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. CHALAPALLI ROAD, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5397 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in not receiving the complaint and registering a crime against the Respondent 4 and 5 for the offences committed on 30-3- 2019 as illegal, arbitrary, whimsical, malafide, colorable exercise of power, violating Art. 14, 19, and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to receive the Petitioner's complaint and register a crime against the Respondents 4 and 5 and pass…” 2. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption for dismissal. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 14.08.2025 Pmk 4 40 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:5397 OF 2019 Date: 14.08.2025 Pmk