IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 597 OF 2006 Appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, against the Order and Decree dated 12-05-2006 passed in HMOP No. 109 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Guntur, Guntur District. Between: th Alla Haripriya, W/o.Sridhar, R/o.H.No.2-1-21, Vangayagudem, 36 Ward, Eluru, West Godavari District. ...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT AND Alla Sridhar, S/o.Perumallu, aged about 38 years, R/o.4*^ Line, 2 Cross, Kakateeya Postal Colony, Guntur, working as Clerk-cum-Cashier in Indian Overseas Bank, Jagityal, Karimnagar District. nd ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER I.A. NO: 2 OF 2006 rCMAMP. NO: 1558 OF 2006) between: nd Alla Sridhar, S/o.Perumallu, aged 38 years, R/o.4 Line, 2 Kakateeya Postal Colony, Guntur. Cross, % j ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND Alla Haripriya, W/o.Sridhar, H.No.2-1-21, Vangayagudem, 36*^ Ward Eluru, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 13.07.2006 in CMP No.1175 of 2006inCMANo.597of2006. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2006fCMAMP. NO: 1175 OF 2006) Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Judgment and decree in HMOP.No.109 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Guntur, dated 12-5-2006 pending disposal of CMA. Counsel for the Appellant :SRI A NARASIMHA RAO (NO REPRESENTATION) Counsel for the Respondent :SRI CHALLA AJAY KUMAR (NO REPRESENTATION) The Court made the following JUDGMENT : 1 (RNT,J &CGR,J C.M.A. N0.597 0F2006) APHC010122032006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3509] [^J-5 WEDNESDAY JHE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY' ' TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 597/2006 Between: Alla Haripriya ...APPELLANT AND Alla Sridhar ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.A NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR The Court made the following: JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 06.01.2025, the following order was passed: “This appeal ivas filed by the wife being aggrieved from the decree of divorce granted respondent/ husband. 2. The appellant has also filed the petition for restitution of conjugal rights, which was also rejected by the common order. the petition of the on 2 (RNT,J &CGR,J C.M.A. NO.597 OF 2006) 3. However, this appeal was confined to the grant of divorce decree. 4. There is interim order of the decree of divorce passed by the learned Court. 5. Sri Challa Ajay Kumar, learned counsel appears for the respondent. 6. No representation for the appellant. 7. However, considering the nature of dispute and as there is interim order, we grant one more opportunity to learned counsel for the appellant to appear and argue the matter. 8. Post after three (03) weeks in the weekly cause-list.” 2. Today, there is no representation from either side. The matter pertains to the year 2006. 3. Interim order granted earlier dated 13.07.2006 stands 4. vacated. 5. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed “for want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. SD/- S.V.S.R.MURTHY JOINT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Guntur, Guntur District. 2. One CC to Sri A Narasimha Rao Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Challa Ajay Kumar Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies BSV TAC HIGH COURT DATED:29/01/2025 JUDGMENT CMA.No.597 of 2006 g 0 5 MAR 20?5 Co. ^ . Current Section ^ S^5^SPATCH^5^' DISMISSING THE CMA FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS