Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:11417] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3523/2025 Jay Singh S/o Ram Sahay, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Singrawali, P.s. Gari Bajana, District Bharatpur ( At Present In Central Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Abhilasha Choudhary for Mr. Satyapal Poshwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 12/03/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS Act, 2023 on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused- applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 176/2019 registered at Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 457, 380 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the accused-applicant is aged about 40 years, and is surviving with wife, two children & mother, who is a senior citizen, nevertheless, the applicant is the sole bread earner for the family. Moreover, the applicant has remained in custody for more than three months and challan is already filled in the present matter. It is lastly, contended that the trial will take time to culminate.
3. The mother and wife of the accused-applicant have marked their presence in the Court and have submitted that the family is
[2025:RJ-JP:11417] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3523/2025] facing severe hardships, due to the applicant being incarcerated. Moreover, the family members have assured that if the accused- applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not commit any offence nor shall be indulged in any bad company.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. Considering, the foregoing facts of the case, the contentions made by the learned counsel of the parties, that the applicant is the sole bread earner of the family and the fact that there is a family who is solely dependent upon the applicant; that the applicant has remained in custody for more than three months; that challan is already filled in the present matter and the trial will take time to culminate; this Court deems it proper to grant bail to the applicant subject to a condition that once in a month, he will mark presence at the concerned Police Station.
6. Accordingly, the present bail application is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-applicant Jay Singh S/o Ram Sahay shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /515