Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3255 CRL.A No. 200127 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 200127 OF 2025 (U/S 14 (A)) BETWEEN:
ANIL S/O RAJAPPA IDILAYI, AGE:25 YEARS, OCC: CENTRING WORK, R/O. NEAR BHAVANI TEMPLE, CHANDAPUR TQ.CHINCHOLI, DIST.KALABURAGI - 585307
…APPELLANT (BY SRI. SANTOSH PATIL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE THROUGH, CHINCHOLI POLICE STATION, TQ.CHINCHOLI, DIST.KALABURAGI–585307.
REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNTATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH-585107.
2.
PUNDALIK S/O KHIRU PAWAR, AGE:40 YEARS, OCC: LABOURER, R/O. GANGUNAYAK TANDA, CHANDAPUR, TQ.CHINCHOLI, DIST.KALABURAGI-585307.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI VEERANAGOUDA MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1;
R2 SERVED)
Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3255 CRL.A No. 200127 of 2025
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/SEC. 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (PA) ACT, PRAYING TO I) THAT, THE HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 07.04.2025 PASSED IN SPL. CASE (POCSO) NO. 91/2025 BY THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND FTSC-I (POCSO) AT KALABURAGI. II) THAT, FOR THE REASONS STATED ABOVE AMONGST OTHERS, IT IS HUMBLY PRAYED THAT, THE HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO GRANT THE REGULAR BAIL TO THE APPELLANT/ ACCUSED IN SPL.
CASE (POCSO) NO.91/2025 (CHINCHOLI PS CRIME NO.6/2025 DISTRICT KALABURAGI) PENDING ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND FTSC-I (POCSO) AT KALABURAGI AND FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 332(b), 64(1) OF BNS-2023 AND U/SEC.
4 AND 6 OF POCSO ACT, 2012 AND U/SEC. 3(2)(va), 3(2)(v) OF SC/ST POA ACT 1989.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA)
Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo. The said memo reads as under:
“Memo for Withdrawal
In the above mentioned case, the counsel for the appellant is withdrawing the appeal filed. Hence, the same is not pressed and be pleased to permit the appellant to withdraw and be taken as dismissed as withdrawn.
Hence, this memo.”
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3255 CRL.A No. 200127 of 2025
Placing the memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SVH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3 CT:PK