Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10645 (RAJ)

SATYAPAL PAREEK v. STATE HOME DEPARTMENTORS

CW/829/2016 · 2025-02-27

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.828/2016 Lalit Pareek s/o Shri Ghanshyam Pareek, aged about 41 years, Resident of Dandotiya ki Badi, Rajeev Nagar, Teil Factory, Baran (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Director General of Police, Government of Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur. 2. The Inspector General of Police, Kota Range, Kota (Raj.) ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.829/2016 Satyapal Pareek s/o Shri Ghanshyam Pareek, aged about 42 years, Resident of Dandotiya ki Badi, Rajeev Nagar, Teil Factory, Baran (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Director General of Police, Government of Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur. 2. The Inspector General of Police, Kota Range, Kota (Raj.) ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14482/2016 Satyapal Pareek s/o Shri Ghanshyam Pareek, aged about 42 years, Resident of Dandotiya ki Badi, Rajeev Nagar, Teil Factory, Baran (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Director General of Police, Government of Rajasthan, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur. 2. The Inspector General of Police, Kota Range, Kota (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Saxena JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND (2 of 2) [CW-828/2016] Order 27/02/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by efflux of time, these writ petitions have become infructuous. These writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/217-219