HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40984 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. The matter has been taken up as mentioned cases. 2. Heard Mr. Vipin Gangwar, learned counsel for the applicant, and Mr. Radhey Shyam, learned AGA for the State. 3. The present application has been filed with prayer to quash entire proceedings of Session Trial No.- 406 of 2024 (State Vs. Zirar Ahmad and others) arising out of Case Crime No.- 851 of 2012, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 323, 336, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S- Baheri, District- Bareilly pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.9, Bareilly on the basis of compromise. 4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicants, opposite party no.2 and legal heirs of first informant have entered into compromise and they have amicably settled all the disputes on the basis of compromise. The compromise has already been verified by learned court concerned and report of proceedings of verification of compromise is on record. It was submitted that the complainant does not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vipin Gangwar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Zirar Ahmad And 7 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 7. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise. In the instant case it was submitted that both the parties have settled all the disputes and compromised the matter. It was submitted on behalf of both the parties that impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. There is nothing to indicate that parties have any criminal antecedents. Considering the law laid down in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned charge-sheets/cognizance- summoning order and entire proceedings of Session Trial No.- 406 of 2024 (State Vs. Zirar Ahmad and others) arising out of Case Crime No.- 851 of 2012, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 323, 336, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S- Baheri, District- Bareilly pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.9, Bareilly against applicants, namely, Zirar Ahmad, Shahid Ahmad, Nasir Ahmad, Akhlaq Ahmad, Kafeel Ahmad, Waqeel Ahmad, Laiq Ahmad and Naseemuddin are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. September 26, 2025 Sanjeet A482 No. 40984 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad