CRM-M-60106-2024 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 245 CRM-M-60106-2024 Date of Decision: 28.04.2025 Vikas @ Diljale ...Peoner Versus State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Siddarth, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Naveen Kumar Sheoran, D.A.G., Haryana. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police Sta.on Sec.ons 151 10.06.2020 Farrukh Nagar, District Gurgaon 302, 34 IPC and 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act The peoner incarcerated in the FIR caponed above, has come up before this Court under Secon 483 BNSS seeking regular bail. 2. It would be appropriate to refer to para 17 of the bail peon, which reads as follows: 17. That the peoner undertakes that he shall not take any undue advantage of his liberty/bail or abuse his liberty in any manner. It is pernent to menon here that Yes other FIR/criminal case is pending against the peoner. 3. It means that the peoner is trying to conceal the criminal antecedents deliberately. However, as per paragraph 11 of the status report dated 31.01.2025, State has been able to trace the following cases against the peoner in the State of Haryana and Delhi. Sr. No. FIR No. Date/year Offences Police Sta.on 1. 98 02.05.2015 395 IPC Farrukh Nagar, District Gurugram 2. 05 07.01.2019 323, 506, 34 IPC Farrukh Nagar, District Gurugram 3. 271 08.09.2019 25 of Arms Act Farrukh Nagar, District Gurugram 4. 53 24.04.2020 186, 188, 269, 270, 271, 332, 353 IPC and 51 D.M. Act Excise Act Dujana, District Jhajjar 5. 123 10.05.2020 188 IPC and 51 DM Act and Excise Act Farrukh Nagar, District Gurugram 6. 98 09.06.2020 147, 148, 285, 302, Dujana, District Jhajjar JYOTI 2025.04.29 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-60106-2024 2 120-B IPC 7. 248 08.06.2020 365, 395, 397, 120-B IPC and 25 of Arms Act Pataudi, District Gurugram 8. 641 2020 186, 332, 353, 307, 34 IPC and 25 of Arms Act Chawla Delhi 9. 162 2020 411 IPC Special Cell, Delhi 4. Given above, the present peon is dismissed for non-menoning of the criminal antecedents. Peoner shall be at liberty to file fresh peon a?er disclosing all criminal antecedents including the cases, in which peoner has been convicted and the cases as menoned in the status report. It is clarified that there shall be no need to menon those cases in which cancellaon report have been filed and peoner is discharged or acquiAed. Since peoner has already given power of aAorney to his counsel in this peon, as such, Registry shall not insist to file power of aAorney in case fresh peon is filed and power of aAorney filed in this peon shall suffice. All pending miscellaneous applicaons, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 28.04.2025 Jyo-II Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No JYOTI 2025.04.29 15:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.