Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10642 (UTT)

RASHMI RAWAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/1420/2025 · 2025-08-28

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:7639 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/1420/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mr. Anil Anthwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. B.D. Pande, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 - Commission. 4. According to petitioner, she was selected in a selection held by Uttarakhand Subordinate Service Selection Commission (in short “Commission”) for the post of Assistant Librarian, however, she could not present herself for documents verification in the Office of Commission before the deadline indicated in the notification. 5. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:- (i) A suitable writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 3 to provide a last opportunity to the petitioner (Roll No. 1201290077) on humanitarian ground permitting her to appear for document verification providing a one of the post according to her preference i.e. the post of Deputy Librarian bearing Post code No. 818/710/67/2024, Librarian and Information Assistant bearing Post Code No. 818/418/67/2024 and Assistant Librarian having post code number (464/518/67/2024). 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner 2025:UHC:7639 submits that petitioner has made a representation to the Chairman of the Commission on 17.08.2025. 7. Mr. B.D. Pande, learned counsel for the Commission, however, submits that it is not known whether the representation, which is enclosed with the writ petition, was actually served in the Office of Chairman or not. 8. In such view of the matter, let petitioner make fresh representation seeking extension of deadline fixed by the Commission for documents verification. If petitioner makes such application within 48 hours, through e- mail, the Competent Authority in the Commission shall take decision on petitioner’s representation, as per law, within seven days thereafter. 9. Let certified copy of this order be supplied to petitioner today itself, on payment of usual charges. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 28.08.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f980 2a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C 22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.08.28 05:00:50 -07'00' 2025:UHC:7639