APHC010121682011 -:cscr. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ■Jk FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10499 OF 2011 Between: C.Ramanjaneyulu, S/o. Chennappa, age 32 years, R/o. Nallur Village Roddam Mandal, Anantapur District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The District Collector cum District Programme Coordinator National Rural Employee Guarantee Scheme (NREGS), Ananatapur District. 2. The Project Director, DWMA, Anantapur Anantapur District. 3. The Mandal Parished Development Officer Cum Programme Office NREGS, Roddam Mandal, Anantapur District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings Rc.No.1058/HR/Roddam/10 dt. 09-11-2010, Rc.No.1058/HR/FA/Roddam/09 dt. 18-01-2011 issued by the 2^^ respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to continue as Filed Assistant, Rc.No.907/HR/Roddam/10 dt.8-12-2010 and Nallur Gram Panchayat.Roddam Mandal, Ananatpur District with all Consequential benefits. lA NO: 1 OF 201irWPMP 12898 OF 2011t t . Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings Rc.No.1058/HR/Roddam/10 dt. 09-11-2010. Rc.No.907/HR/Roddam/10 dt. 8-12-2010 and Rc.No.105/HR/FA/Roddam/09 dt. 18-01-2011 issued by the 2"^ respondent. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. A.VIJAYALAKSHMI (Not appeared) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3: SRI M. S. R. CHANDRA MURTHY, SC FOR MGNREGS Counsel for the Respondent No.2:GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT The Court made the following order: APHC010121682011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] Mi FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 10499/2011 Between: 1.C.RAMANJANEYULU, R/O. NALLUR VILLAGE, RODDAM MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NATIONAL RURAL, EMPLOYEE GUARANTEE SCHEME (NREGS) ANANATAPUR DISTRICT. 2.THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DWMA ANANTAPUR ANANTAPUR, DISTRICT. 3.THE MANDAL PARISHED DEVELOPMENT OFFICER CUM PROGRAMME, OFFICE RODDAM MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT{S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings Rc.No.1058/HR/Roddam/10,dt.09.11.2010, Rc.No.907/HR/Roddam/10 dt. 8-12-2010 and Rc.No.105/HR/FA/Roddam/09 dt. 18-01-2011 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to continue as Filed Assistant, Nallur Gram Panchayat.Roddam Mandal, Ananatpur District with all Consequential benefits. lA NO: 1 OF 2011 (WPMP 12898 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings Rc.No.907/HR/Roddam/10dt.8.12.2010andRc.No.105/HR/FA/Roddam /09 dt. 18-01-2011 issued by the 2nd respondent. dt.09.11.2010, Rc.No.1058/HR/Roddam/10 ? Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VIJAYALAKSHMI AGISAM V; Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) 2.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV i The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 10499 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting his case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. Sd/- J. SAROJA assistant REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SgCTGffOFFICER To, Subba Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 1. One CC to Sri K. V. 2. Two CCS to GP for Higher Education High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies ssb HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER WP No.10499 OF 2011 AND/y;^ 1 h AUfi 2025 ^ . Curreni s>eciion ^ ^ :e m <5: 03 •irA DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR WITHOUT COSTS NON-PROSECUTION