Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10639 (KAR)

ASHWATH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR

CRL.P/200948/2024 · 2025-03-12

S Rachaiah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1600 CRL.P No. 200948 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200948 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: ASHWATH S/O TUKARAM RATHOD, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE NOW LEGAL PRACTITIONER, R/AT STATION THANDA, CHITTAPUR-585211. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. C. JAKA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH CHITTAPUR POLICE STATION, DIST. KALABURAGI-585211, NOW REPRESENTED BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH-585107. 2. MAHADEV S/O SOMLA RATHOD, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/AT. STATION THANDA, CHITTAPUR-585211. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI GOPAL KRISHNA YADAV, HCGP FOR R1 SRI SHIVASHARANA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYIHNG TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CC NO. 115/2018, PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHITTAPUR, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 323, 324, 504, 506 OF IPC, WHICH IS REGISTERED ON THE Digitally signed by RENUKA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1600 CRL.P No. 200948 of 2024 BASIS OF CASE REGISTERED IN CRIME NO. 136/2017, BY THE CHITTAPUR POLICE AND AFTER INVESTIGATION FILED CHARGE SHEET AGAINST THE PETITIONER, TO SECURE THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND TO PREVENT ABUSE OF PROCESS OF THE COURT AND PASS SUCH OTHER ORDER OR ORDERS, WHICH THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO PASS, IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The averments of the said memo, which reads as under: “The advocate for the petitioners submits that, in the case after trial the petitioners has been acquitted by the Trial Court on 20.02.2025, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition. Hence, the memo for withdrawal of the case” On reading of the averments of the said memo, leave is granted. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE TMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20 CT:PK