HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 1096 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioners feel that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 17, 2025 NLY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava, Smt. Alka Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Kalu Ram And Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad