TADISETTY PEDALAKSHMAIAH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/6357/2025 · 2025-03-17
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10636 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10636 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010121452025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 6357/2025 Between:
1. TADISETTY PEDALAKSHMAIAH, S/O.LATE APPAIAH AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. EEDARA VILLAGE, AGIRIPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT.
2. PILLIBOINA YESUBABU, S/O.TIRAPATAIAH, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O.
EEDARA VILLAGE, AGIRIPALLI MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT.
3. REDDI TIRAPATI VENKAIAH, S/O.NAGAIAH, AGED 55 YEARS,R/O.
EEDARA VILLGE, AGIRIPALLI MANDAL ELURU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECOR, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU.
4. THE TAHASILDAR, AGIRIPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT.
5. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, AGIRIPALLI, ELURU DISTRICT.
2
6. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, EEDARA VILLAGE, AGIRIPALLI MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. B ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri B. Ashok Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, Sri Panku Rajesh Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat.
2. Sri B. Ashok Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition.
3. Permission granted.
4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh Writ Petition, if so advised. No order as to costs.
5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 17.03.2025 DSV