HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39213 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. The application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. No.39213 of 2024 is taken up and the connected Application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. No.37267 of 2024 is de-tagged with the above application. 2. Heard Shri Rupendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants, Shri Santosh Kumar Verma, learned counsel for opposite party nos. 2 to 4 and Shri J.P. Singh, learned AGA for the State. 3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings, including proceedings of cognizance order dated 09.02.2022 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.181 of 2022 (New Case No.299 of 2024) (State Vs. Hashim and others), arising out of Case Crime No.215 of 2021, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 308 IPC, P.S. Sambhal, District Sambhal, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)/ Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal at Chandausi, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same on the record. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Kumar Srivastava, Rupendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Santosh Kumar Verma, G.A. Hashim And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) learned counsel for the applicants. 6. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned charge-sheets/cognizance- summoning order and entire proceedings of Case Crime No.215 of 2021, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 308 IPC, P.S. Sambhal, District Sambhal, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)/ Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal at Chandausi, against the applicants, namely, Hashim, Khalid, Parvez and Abdul Wahid, are hereby quashed. 8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is allowed. September 9, 2025 RKM A482 No. 39213 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad