V SURESH KUMAR v. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR APSPECL
WP/6587/2025 · 2025-07-13
Nyapathy Vijay
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10634 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10634 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010121712025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 6587/2025 Between:
1. V SURESH KUMAR, S/O LATE V.Z. DHYRIAM, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, (RTD.), APSPDCL, TIRUPATHI, R/O D.NO. 95/22-20, SRI POTTI SRI RAMULU NAGAR, RIMS ROAD, KADAPA -
516004.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR APSPECL, APSPDCL, TIRUPATHI, D. NO. 19-13/65/A, TIRUCHANUR ROAD, SRINIVASAPURAM, TIRUPATHI.
2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER FINANCE, APSPDCL, TIRUPATHI, D. NO. 19-13/65/A, TIRUCHANUR ROAD, SRINIVASAPURAM, TIRUPATHI.
3. THE PAY OFFICER, APSPDCL, TIRUPATHI, D. NO. 19- 13/65/A,
TIRUCHANUR ROAD, SRINIVASAPURAM, TIRUPATHI.
4. THE GENERAL MANAGER, R LA, APSPDCL, TIRUPATHI,
5. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, HRD APSPDCL, TIRUPATHI, D. NO. 19-13/65/A, TIRUCHANUR ROAD, SRINIVASAPURAM, TIRUPATHI.
2
6. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANGER, APSPDCL, TIRUPATHI, D.
NO. 19-13/65/A, TIRUCHANUR ROAD, SRINIVASAPURAM, TIRUPATHI.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL
2. The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.6587 of 2025 ORDER:
1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning Memo No.CMD/ CGM/ HRD/ GM/ HRD/ GM/HR-I/ DGM (Pen)/ IPO/ F.No.948/ D.No.335/24, dated 11.06.2024 issued by Respondent No.2, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. At the time of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that due to certain mistakes in the Writ Petition, he was advised to withdraw the Writ Petition, with a request to grant liberty to file fresh Writ Petition.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed, as withdrawn, granting liberty to the Petitioner to file Writ Petition afresh.
5. No order as to costs.
6. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 14.07.2025
IS
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION No.6587 of 2025 Date: 14.07.2025
IS