HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37451 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. This has been taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Mr. Jaipal, holding brief of Sri Vishal Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant s and Mr. Raghuraj Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri S.K. Rai, learned AGA for the State respondents. 3. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred for quashing the summoning and cognizance order dated 19.9.2022 as well as the entire proceeding of Case No. 28643 of 2024 (State vs. Moti alias Mevaram and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 21 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308 IPC, P.S. Nagla Singhi, District Firozabad pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Fiorozabad on the basis of compromise deed executed by the parties on 18.10.2024. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicants and the opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicant and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vishal Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Raghuraj Singh, G.A., Rajesh Kumar Moti Alias Meva Ram And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) made by the learned counsel for the applicants. 5. In view of the fact that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of summoning and cognizance order dated 19.9.2022 as well as the entire proceeding of Case No. 28643 of 2024 (State vs. Moti alias Mevaram and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 21 of 2021, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308 IPC, P.S. Nagla Singhi, District Firozabad pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Fiorozabad on the basis of compromise deed executed by the parties on 18.10.2024 are hereby quashed. 7. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 23, 2025 Abhishek A482 No. 37451 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad