Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:53795-DB HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (Sl. No. 27) Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1895 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sukhbeer Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anita Yadav,Sukhbeer Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. The prayer made in the instant petition is for a direction to respondent no. 4 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 30.9.2024 in regard to non-payment of compensation to the petitioner for plot no. 696 Village Deri Kot, Tehsil-Dadri, Distict- Gautam Buddh Nagar and wherein according to the petitioner his share was 480.11 square meters. It is stated that the acquisition was made nine years back but the compensation has not been paid to the petitioner so far. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has placed on record the written instructions received from respondent no. 4, according to which Writ No. 2907 of 1989 (Jai Singh Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gautam Budh Nagar) and Writ No. 863 of 2021 (Vikas Kumar vs Deputy Director of Consolidation, Gautam Budh Nagar) are pending before this Court in respect of same land. It is also stated that therein an injunction order dated 28.6.2021 is in operation. Additionally, it is stated that 4.4.2025 was fixed in the matter before respondent no. 4 and on which date the parties did not appear. On 9.4.2025 the heirs of Jai Singh appeared and they themselves requested for adjournment in view of pendency of the proceedings before this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although his father was party in the writ petition as a respondent but the petitioner has no knowledge. 4. As the proceedings are stated to be pending before respondent no. 4, therefore, we dispose of the instant petition with direction to respondent no. 4 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 30.9.2024 within twelve weeks from the date of communication of the instant order. The effect of interim order passed in Writ No. 2907 of 1989 shall also be considered while deciding the representation. 5. Needless to mention that the decision would be taken after due notice to all the persons likely to be affected therein. 6. Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel is present on behalf of respondent no. 2. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 Kirti (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad