SRI SRI AKHANDALMANI MAHADEV BIJE, KENDRAPADA v. STATE OF ODISHA
WP(C)/36585/2025 · 2026-01-12
Sashikanta Mishra
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1063 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1063 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.36585 of 2025
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER 12.01.2026
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 30.04.2003 passed by the Sub-Collector, Kendrapada in Mutation Appeal No.11 of
2002. It is submitted that the petitioner was never aware of the passing of such order as he was not made a party. Recently when the Opposite Parties attempted to disturb his possession, he came to know about the same and has approached this Court.
3. As already stated, the impugned order was passed more than twenty two years back. The claim that the petitioner was not aware of passing of the impugned order, though plausible, is not believable. The further claim that he came to know about the order only recently when the Opposite Parties attempted to create disturbance in its possession, is also not believable in the absence of any materials being placed before this Court. Sri Sri Akhandalamani Mahadev Bije, Kendrapada .… Petitioner Represented by
Mr. R. Mohanty, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & Others .… Opp. Parties Represented by
Mr. S. N. Patnaik, Additional Government Advocate
Order No.
01. . p. 2
4. This Court is therefore, not inclined to entertain the writ application at such belated stage. It shall be open to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum, if so advised.
5. The writ application is disposed of accordingly.
(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge
Puspanjali Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack.