Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 106295 (ALL)

VINAY KUMAR ALIAS RAJU v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/37470/2024 · 2025-05-11

Deepak Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:76494 Court No. - 84 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37470 of 2024 Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Alias Raju Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Mishra,Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Sri Amitesh Kumar Srivastava, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2. The same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 08.03.2024; cognizance order dated 06.08.2024 as well as entire proceedings of Case No.5646 of 2024 (State Versus Vinay Kumar) arising out of Case Crime No.178 of 2023, under Sections 363, 366 I.P.C., Police Station-Mirzapur, District- Saharanpur. 4. Counsel for the applicant submits that after lodging of F.I.R., applicant solemnized marriage with daughter of opposite party no. 2. It is next submitted that daughter of opposite party no. 2 is legally wedded wife of applicant and she is presently living with applicant and discharging her matrimonial duties with love and affection. Further submission is that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have amicably settled their dispute out of court and entered into a compromise. A copy of the compromise deed entered into between the parties has been annexed with supplementary affidavit. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute the correctness of the facts. 6. Accordingly, it is provided that the parties shall appear before the court below along with a certified copy of this order on the next date fixed. It is therefore expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of the parties; compromise entered into between the parties and pass an appropriate order to that effect within next four weeks. It shall be open to the applicant to file a fresh application U/S 482 at that stage for the relief sought herein. 7. In view of the above, the present application is disposed of. 8. For a period of six weeks, no coercive measure shall be taken against the applicant. Order Date :- 12.5.2025/Meenu Singh Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad