Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10629 (KAR)

BABU @ SHANMUKH v. THE TOWN PLANNING AUTHORITY

WP/201117/2025 · 2025-06-16

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3107 WP No. 201117 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.201117 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. BABU @ SHANMUKH S/O MARAGANNA, AGE: 89 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 2. SHIVARAJ S/O ANTAPPA BOKKE, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 3. LAXMAN S/O DEVINDRAPPA, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 4. KHOBANNA S/O MARUTI, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 5. GOVIND S/O MARUTI, AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 6. VENKAT S/O MARUTI, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 7. RAMANNA S/O MARUTI, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, ALL R/O TRIPURANT, TQ. BASAVAKALYAN, DIST. BIDAR. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARSHAVARDHAN R. MALIPATIL, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by LUCYGRACE Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3107 WP No. 201117 of 2025 AND: 1. THE TOWN PLANNING AUTHORITY, BASAVAKALYAN-585 327, BY IT’S MEMBER SECRETARY. 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIDHAN SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001, BY IT’S SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHESHADRI JAISHANKAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION ALONG WITH MODIFIED LAYOUT MAP OF THE PETITIONERS DATED 27.01.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-C WITHIN A STIPULATED TIME AND CONSEQUENTLY APPROVE THE MODIFIED LAYOUT AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN) Petitioners are said to have formed a residential layout in 14 acres 27 guntas of land in Sy. No.124/* of Tripuranth in Basavakalyan Taluk. They have applied for modification of the plan sanctioned. As the same has not - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3107 WP No. 201117 of 2025 been considered so far, the present writ petition is filed with a prayer to direct respondent No.1 to consider the request of the petitioners in accordance with law. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate, upon instructions submits that the request of the petitioners will be considered in accordance with law and appropriate orders will be passed. 3. Hence, the following: ORDER Respondent No.1 is directed to consider the request of the petitioners at Annexure-C to the writ petition within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and pass appropriate orders. Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE LG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60