ISARAT KHAN AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
A482/37932/2024 · 2025-08-22
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106243 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106243 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:146360 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37932 of 2024 Applicant :- Isarat Khan And 8 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Kumar Mishra,Shashi Kant Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anand Kumar Mishra,G.A.,Sandeep Singh Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.
1. The case is taken up on mentioning.
2. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants, is taken on record.
3. Heard Sri Rajiv Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Sandeep Singh, learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 to 7 and Sri Ashish Kumar Tripathi, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1.
3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Case No.1269 of 2022 (State Vs. Ikhalak and others), arising out Case Crime No.44 of 2015, under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 452, 504, IPC, Police Station Agota, District Bulandshahar, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-III, Bulandshahar, on the basis of compromise.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party nos.2 to 7 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and certified copy of the proceeding of compromise verification is already on record as annexure No.S.A.-
1 to the supplementary affidavit. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party nos.2 to 7, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party nos.2 to 7 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above
submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants.
6. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party nos.2 to 7 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants.
7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceedings of Case No.1269 of 2022 (State Vs. Ikhalak and others), arising out Case Crime No.44 of 2015, under sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 452, 504, IPC, Police Station Agota, District Bulandshahar, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-III, Bulandshahar, are hereby quashed.
8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed.
Order Date :- 23.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad