Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10624 (UTT)

HANSRAJ SETIYA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1988/2021 · 2025-04-07

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2594 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1988 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Soniya Chawla, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned D.A.G. with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 & 2. 3. By means of the present criminal writ petition, petitioners have challenged the FIR No.607 of 2021 dated 22.10.2021 registered with P.S. Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar, under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 406 of IPC. 4. It is informed by the learned State Counsel that after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted by the police on 26.05.2022 against the petitioners, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in this writ petition and it becomes infructuous. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not disputed the said fact. 6. In view of the above, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is open to petitioners to challenge the charge-sheet in appropriate proceedings, before the appropriate forum. 7. Interim order dated 29.10.2021 stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 07.04.2025 PN