Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10621 (AP)

Pathakota Brahmanayya Naidu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/7430/2020 · 2025-02-19

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010121732020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Pathakota Brahmanayya Naidu and The State of Andhra Pradesh and Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that after filing the writ petition, the petitioners have been awarded compensation for the acquisition of the subject lands. Therefore, he contends that no further orders are necessary, as the grievance of the petitioners has been resolved. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 7430/2020 Pathakota Brahmanayya Naidu and others ...Petitioners AND Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: P Roy Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Revenue (AP) The Court made the following order: It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that after filing the writ petition, the petitioners have been awarded compensation for the acquisition of the subject lands. Therefore, he contends that no further the grievance of the petitioners has been resolved. the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Petitioners Respondents GP for Revenue (AP) It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that after filing the writ petition, the petitioners have been awarded compensation for the acquisition of the subject lands. Therefore, he contends that no further the grievance of the petitioners has been resolved. the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA BSK 45 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 7430/2020 Date: 19.02.2025 BSK