Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10620 (RAJ)

SMT USHA KAPOOR v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/1692/2002 · 2025-09-11

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:37021] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1692/2002 Smt. Usha Kapoor wife of Shri S.P. Kapoor, aged about 57 years, resident of 4/266, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan through its Secretary to the Government, Government of Rajasthan, Education Department, Secretariat, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Deputy Director Edcuation (Secondary), Education Department, Jaipur Region, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7982/2004 Smt. Usha Kapoor wife of Shri S.P. Kapoor, aged about 58 years, resident of 4/266, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan through its Secretary to the Government, Government of Rajasthan, Education Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Deputy Director Education (Secondary), Education Department, Jaipur Region, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Yadav Mr. Mahendra Verma for Mr. Dinesh Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhavya Kala for Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order [2025:RJ-JP:37021] (2 of 2) [CW-1692/2002] 11/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite best efforts, no updated instructions have been received from the client, and consequently, in the absence of such instructions, counsel is unable to argue the matter. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, present writ petitions are dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the writ petitions, if the cause of action still survives, subject to applicable law. 4. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /3-4