Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93712 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36579 of 2024 Petitioner :- Raj Kumari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sinhasan Ram Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief:-
"i. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the orders dated 30.08.2024 passed by the respondent no.2 in Case No. 1016 of 2024 Computerized Case No. D202414290001016, (Shashi Kumari and others Vs. State of U.P. and others) Under Section 98 (1) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. (Annexure no.1 to this writ petition). ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 3 to 6 not create any third party right over the property Arazi No. 1773 area 0.1455 hectare during the pendency of the writ petition." Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that by the order dated 30.8.2024, private respondents have been granted permission to execute a sale deed for more than the share of the respondents. In this regard, learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon a family settlement. Such a factual dispute cannot examined by this Court. The proper course open for the petitioner is either move a recall application or file a revision against the order impugned. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 S. Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam, J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad