Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10619 (UTT)

DAVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1983/2021 · 2025-03-28

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1983 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. None present for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Parth Tamta, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Learned State Counsel made a statement at bar that after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted on 21.12.2021 against petitioner no.1 (Davinder Singh) only, while the petitioner nos.2 to 6 (Satnam Kaur, Kirpal Kaur, Kamla Kaur, Avtar Kaur and Dharam Singh) have been exonerated. 5. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 6. However, it is open to the charge-sheeted petitioner to challenge the charge-sheet before the appropriate Forum under the appropriate law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 28.03.2025 AK