IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.5086 of 2025 Decided on: 7th April, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajo Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and another .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is presently serving as Group Instructor in Government Industrial Training Institute Berthin, District Bilaspur. Her case is that she is 75% disabled and is left with one year for superannuation. For these reasons, she moved a representation on 10.12.2024 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.2, seeking benefit of Clauses 5.3 and 5.5 of the transfer policy for her posting at a place convenient to her. Petitioner’s grievance is that her 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 aforesaid representation has not been considered and decided by the competent authority till date. 3. Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 10.12.2024 (Annexure P-2) in accordance with law and applicable transfer policy within a period of three weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 07, 2025 Judge Mukesh