Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10617 (ALL)

DILIP SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIB/308/2025 · 2025-01-24

J J Munir

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13219 Court No. - 49 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 308 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dilip Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyam Maurya,Vishal Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J. 1. Heard Mr. Vishal Agarwal, learned Counsel for the petitioners in support of this petition at length and Mr. Girijesh Kumar Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3. 2. The Deputy Director of Consolidation has set aside the orders dated 17.10.2022 and 18.03.2024 passed by the Consolidation Officer, Mainpuri in proceedings under Sections 9-A(2) and 42-A of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has been at pains to persuade this Court, that the orders impugned are manifestly illegal and that we should interfere with the remand and bring proceedings to an end endorsing the Consolidation Officer's order. 4. A perusal of the impugned orders shows that the remand has been made noticing procedural irregularities with no expression of opinion on the merits of the parties' case by the Deputy Director of Consolidation. It is an open remand where parties will have opportunity to put forward their case. Given this state of things and the character of the order impugned, being an order of remand, we do not think that this is a fit case for the exercise of our jurisdiction under Section 226 of the Constitution to interfere with an order of remand. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 24.1.2025 Prashant D. Digitally signed by :- PRASHANT DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad