Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 106160 (ALL)

SATISH CHANDRA GUPTA v. State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/17156/2024 · 2025-01-16

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:7403 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17156 of 2024 Petitioner :- Satish Chandra Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brij Raj Singh,Piyush Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief: "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.- 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 08.05.2024 for providing the annual increment on the post of Cane Development Inspector w.e.f. 2020 to 2023 (annexure No.9 to this writ petition)." Learned Standing Counsel submits that petitioner has already represented before the authority concerned on 8th May, 2024 that may be directed to be decided in accordance with law, however, he submits that there is no service report of the representation. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioner, in the first instance to make fresh representation before the authority concerned within a period of four weeks from today and in the event any such representation is moved, as directed herein above, the same shall be considered and disposed of as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months thereafter. Needless to add, the order to be passed by the authority concerned, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. Order Date :- 16.1.2025 Atmesh Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad