Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 106137 (ALL)

RADHIKA DEVI v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/5780/2024 · 2025-09-11

Harvir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5780 of 2024 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of opp. party no. 2 is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist and learned counsel for the opp. party no. 2 are present. 3. Learned counsel for the opp. party no. 2 raised preliminary objection that the present revision is not maintainable in terms of Section 397(3) Cr.P.C. on the ground that the order under challenge dated 08.10.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,Court No. 1, Gorakhpur is a revisional order. Against the order passed by learned A.C.J.M. dated 18.03.2024, a revision no. 122 of 2024 was moved before the court of learned Sessions Judge and the learned Sessions Judge after going through the record passed the order dated 08.10.2024 which is under challenge herein in this Court. The order dated 08.10.2024 is a revisional order, hence, no further revision can be filed. 4. The present revision is dismissed on this ground alone. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Prince Kumar Srivastava, Surendra Dev Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Kundan Mishra Radhika Devi .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. However, it is open for the revisionist to take appropriate legal remedy available to her. 7. Let the certified copy of the impugned order/required document be returned to the learned counsel for the revisionist, as per the Rules. September 12, 2025 Gss CRLR No. 5780 of 2024 2 (Harvir Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- GIRAJA SHANKER SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad