ISTEYAK AHMAD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/37465/2024 · 2025-08-21
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106124 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 106124 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:145448 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37465 of 2024 Applicant :- Isteyak Ahmad And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jai Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ratnesh Kumar Jaiswal Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.
1. The case is taken up on mentioning.
2. Heard Sri Jai Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Ratnesh Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri O. P. Singh, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1.
3. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the impugned order dated 28.08.2024 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.09, Varanasi, in Sessions Trial No.446 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No.247 of 2020, under sections 323, 308, IPC, Police Station Jaitpura, District Varanai, on the basis of compromise.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above
submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants.
6. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants.
7. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned order dated 28.08.2024 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.09, Varanasi, in Sessions Trial No.446 of 2023, arising out of Case Crime No.247 of 2020, under sections 323, 308, IPC, Police Station Jaitpura, District Varanai, are hereby quashed.
8. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed.
Order Date :- 22.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad