[2025:RJ-JP:13100] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3933/2025 Tufail Ahmad S/o Shri Jafar Mohammad, aged about 50 Years, R/o Near Gayatri Temple, Atru Road, Khanpur, Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through Its Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Director, Secondary Education Bikaner, District Bikaner (Rajasthan). 3. The District Education Officer (HQ), Secondary Education, Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya with Ms. Vinita Saini For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 24/03/2025 1. A limited prayer has been made in this petition for issuing a direction to the respondents to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner for redressal of his grievance. 2. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024, has held that whenever a representation is submitted by an aggrieved person, it is expected from the authorities concerned to decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order. [2025:RJ-JP:13100] (2 of 2) [CW-3933/2025] 3. The instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representation (pending, if any) expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. 5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J GARIMA /21