COCP-2589 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 201 Harbans Kaur Surjit Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 the respondent for committing contempt of order dated 22.11.2005 (Annexure P 2856-2004, titled as ‘ others’. 2. 01.10.2013, the present contempt petition was ordered to be heard along with RSA-2856 3. out that the aforesaid second appeal i.e RSA disposed of by a co 13.05.2025, in view of compromise dated 06.02.2025 entered into between the parties. It is accordingly, submitted that the pr has been rendered infructuous. 2589-2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Harbans Kaur Versus Surjit Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None for the petitioner. Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the respondents. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been filed under Section of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for initiating proceedings against the respondent for committing contempt of order dated 22.11.2005 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP 2004, titled as ‘Surjit Singh and others Perusal of the order-sheet(s) reveals that vide order dated 01.10.2013, the present contempt petition was ordered to be heard along 2856-2004. Learned counsel appearing for the responden out that the aforesaid second appeal i.e RSA disposed of by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.05.2025, in view of compromise dated 06.02.2025 entered into between the parties. It is accordingly, submitted that the pr has been rendered infructuous. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2589-2011 Date of Decision: 27.05.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Divanshu Jain, Advocate for the respondents. The present petition has been filed under Sections 11 and 12 for initiating proceedings against the respondent for committing contempt of order dated 22.11.2005 ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP- ers vs. Smt. Harbans Kaur and sheet(s) reveals that vide order dated 01.10.2013, the present contempt petition was ordered to be heard along Learned counsel appearing for the respondents has pointed out that the aforesaid second appeal i.e RSA-2856-2004 has been ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.05.2025, in view of compromise dated 06.02.2025 entered into between the parties. It is accordingly, submitted that the present petition 11 and 12 for initiating proceedings against the respondent for committing contempt of order dated 22.11.2005 Smt. Harbans Kaur and sheet(s) reveals that vide order dated 01.10.2013, the present contempt petition was ordered to be heard along 2004 has been ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.05.2025, in view of compromise dated 06.02.2025 entered into esent petition RISHU KATARIA 2025.05.27 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2589 4. Bench of this Court in RSA counsel for the respondent tag/paginate the same at the appropriate place in the paper 5. the case hav 6. for the petitioner has been duly informed about the date fixed. However, none has put 7. the respondents, nothing survives in the present petition; and the same is disposed of anything survives, appropriate application within a period of 0 reviving the same, if so, advised. 8. 9. 27.05.2025 rishu 2589-2011 -2- Copy of order dated 13.05.2025 passed by a co Bench of this Court in RSA-2856-2004, handed over in Court by learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. Registry to tag/paginate the same at the appropriate place in the paper There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the case having been called twice. Office report dated 21.05.2025, the petitioner has been duly informed about the date fixed. However, none has put in appearance on her behalf. In view of the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the respondents, nothing survives in the present petition; and the same is disposed of as having been rendered infrcutuous. However, in case anything survives, liberty is granted to the appropriate application within a period of 0 reviving the same, if so, advised. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Copy of order dated 13.05.2025 passed by a co-ordinate 2004, handed over in Court by learned State is taken on record. Registry to tag/paginate the same at the appropriate place in the paper-book. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite Office report dated 21.05.2025, indicates that learned counsel the petitioner has been duly informed about the date fixed. However, In view of the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the respondents, nothing survives in the present petition; and the same is s having been rendered infrcutuous. However, in case to the petitioner to move an appropriate application within a period of 03 months from today for Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No ordinate 2004, handed over in Court by learned State is taken on record. Registry to There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite learned counsel the petitioner has been duly informed about the date fixed. However, In view of the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the respondents, nothing survives in the present petition; and the same is s having been rendered infrcutuous. However, in case to move an months from today for RISHU KATARIA 2025.05.27 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.