Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10607 (KAR)

MOHAMMED HAKEEB v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.A/200121/2025 · 2025-06-25

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3361 CRL.A No. 200121 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.200121 OF 2025 (U/S 14 (A)) BETWEEN: MOHAMMED HAKEEB S/O MINODDIN SHIVANAGI, AGE:27 YEARS, OCC: FIELD OFFICER AT NABARD FINANCE, R/O. NARAYANPUR, NOW R/O. ASHRYA COLONY HUNSAGI, TQ. HUNSAGI, DIST. YADGIRI-585215. …APPELLANT (BY SRI RAJESH DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA HUNSAGI POLICE STATION, YADGIRI DISTRICT, NOW REPRESENTED BY, THE ADDITIONAL STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH-585102. 2. SMT. RANGAMMA W/O RANGAPPA BUNKALADODDI, AGE:59 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, HUNSAGI, TQ. HUNSAGI, DIST. YADGIRI-585215 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. ARATI PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; R2 SERVED) Digitally signed by SUMITRA SHERIGAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3361 CRL.A No. 200121 of 2025 THIS CRL.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION 14-A(2) OF SC/ST (PA) ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 04-04-2025 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIRI PASSED IN CRIME NO.19/2025 AND CONSEQUENTLY ENLARGE THE APPELLANT/A-2 (AS PER REMAND SHEET) IN CONNECTION WITH CRIME NO.19/2025 OF HUNSAGI POLICE STATION REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 103, R/W 3(5) OF BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA (BNS), 2023 AND SECTION 3(2) (v) OF SC/ST (PA), 1989., NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF HON’BLE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, YADGIRI IN CRIME NO.19/2025. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo. Memo reads as under: “In the above case, counsel for the appellant most humbly submits that the appellant may kindly be permitted to withdraw the present appeal, since during the pendency of the present appeal charge sheet has been filed before the Trial Court and liberty may kindly be reserved to the appellant to file a bail petition before the Trial Court afresh.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3361 CRL.A No. 200121 of 2025 Placing the memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SRT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6 CT:PK